Executive Summary
The reauthorization of the Undetectable Firearms Act[1],
hidden within the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA)[2],
is a topic of significant concern. The original Act was passed in 1988 as a
response to misconceptions surrounding Glock's polymer pistol[3],
leading to the false belief that it could evade metal detectors. While the Act
sought to ensure the detectability of firearms, advancements in technology,
particularly in 3D printing, have prompted discussions regarding the need for a
reevaluation of the Act's provisions. This policy brief examines the potential
consequences of reauthorizing the Undetectable Firearms Act, particularly in
relation to stifling innovation, encroaching on Second Amendment rights, and
the ongoing debate surrounding firearm detectability.
Background
In 1988, Congress passed the Undetectable Firearms Act[4],
primarily in response to misconceptions surrounding Glock's polymer pistol,
which was erroneously believed to be undetectable by metal detectors. However,
it was later revealed that the claims were unsubstantiated, as the polymer
frame still contained metal components, and ammunition itself triggered metal
detectors. The Act sought to address these concerns by mandating minimum
amounts of metal in firearms to ensure their detectability. The Act was
reauthorized in 2013 and is now potentially up for permanent reauthorization.
Technological Advancements and Innovation
Since the Act's reauthorization in 2013, technology,
particularly in 3D printing, has seen significant advancements. This has led to
the emergence of innovative firearms designers, often from the 3D printing
community, who have leveraged affordable and accessible technology to create
unique firearm designs. 3D printers available for as low as $99 have allowed
individuals to become firearms designers, fostering an interest in engineering
and design skills. Reauthorizing the Undetectable Firearms Act may impede this
innovation and limit the potential benefits derived from these technological
advancements.
Second Amendment Considerations
The potential reauthorization of the Undetectable Firearms
Act raises concerns about encroachment on Second Amendment rights. The Act, if
reauthorized, could impose restrictions on the manufacturing and possession of
firearms, inhibiting law-abiding citizens from exercising their right to bear
arms. Balancing the need for firearm detectability with preserving individual liberties
is crucial in any policy decision related to firearms regulation.
Legislative Process and Stakeholder Influence
Senator Jack Reed (D-RI) is working behind the scenes with
Republicans to attach the reauthorization of the Undetectable Firearms Act[5]
to the NDAA, indicating potential bipartisan support. However, it is important
for all stakeholders, especially gun owners, to voice their opinions and
concerns to their respective Senators. The ongoing lobbying efforts by anti-gun
activists and the potential for astroturfing campaigns highlight the need for
individuals to engage in the democratic process to ensure their voices are
heard.
Conclusion
Reauthorizing the Undetectable Firearms Act, as hidden
within the NDAA, warrants careful consideration due to the potential
implications for innovation and Second Amendment rights. The Act's original
purpose, based on misconceptions surrounding Glock's polymer pistol, may no
longer be applicable in light of technological advancements, particularly in 3D
printing.
