As a Marine combat veteran, I feel compelled to address the recent article published in Stars and Stripes[1] regarding the claim that a history of military service is the most common attribute among Americans who attempted or carried out acts of mass violence. The article suggests that our country should be afraid of her veterans. However, it is important to approach this topic with careful analysis and avoid drawing sweeping conclusions that may perpetuate misconceptions about veterans.
The study[2]
cited in the article, conducted by the National Consortium for the Study of
Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism, provides valuable insights into the
prevalence of military service among individuals involved in acts of mass
violence in the last 30 years. It reveals that military veterans were more
likely to succeed in their plots, although the vast majority of such schemes
were thwarted by law enforcement before any harm occurred. The study also
indicates that extremists with military backgrounds were 2.41 times more likely
to be classified as mass casualty offenders compared to those who never served.
While these findings should not be disregarded, it is
crucial to consider the context surrounding extremism and the military. The
study does not provide information on the historical context of extremism
within the U.S. military, which is an important factor to explore. It is
essential to differentiate between the vast majority of veterans who honorably
served their country and a small fraction who become involved in extremist
activities.
The study's results should inform future efforts to prevent
acts of mass violence by identifying risk factors and developing potential
interventions. It should also encourage further research into the complex
relationship between military service and extremist behavior. Additionally, it
is important to compare this study with research on mental health and mass
violence, as well as investigate other professions or groups with a high
prevalence of extremist ideologies.
It is worth noting that the actions of a few individuals do
not define the character or intentions of an entire group. Veterans have long
been an integral part of our society, contributing to various fields and
demonstrating resilience, leadership, and dedication. It is unjust and
counterproductive to generalize and stigmatize all veterans based on the
actions of a few outliers.
Furthermore, it is essential to address the reference made
to the Department of Homeland Security's (DHS) listing of indicators for law
enforcement to suspect someone of right-wing extremism, which included beliefs
in the Constitution, party affiliation, and veteran status. It is important to
recognize that this listing occurred under the leadership of then-Attorney
General Janet Napolitano in 2009. It sparked controversy and subsequent
apologies were issued[3]
for its wording, as it unfairly cast suspicion on individuals based on their
beliefs and veteran status. It is crucial to separate past misguided policies
from the current sentiments and support for our veterans.
It is vital to approach the topic of military
service and its potential connection to extremist behavior with nuance and
careful consideration. While the study mentioned in the article provides
important insights, it should not be used to perpetuate fear or limit the
opportunities and support available to veterans. We must continue to honor and
support the vast majority of veterans who have selflessly served our nation,
while simultaneously addressing any issues of extremism through research,
education, and intervention programs.
The oath never expired.
Semper Fidelis.
[1] https://www.stripes.com/theaters/us/2023-06-08/military-mass-attacks-veterans-extremism-10378241.html
[2] https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/23838072/pirus-mass-casualty-extremist-offenders-with-military-background-final-3.pdf
[3] https://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/04/16/napolitano.apology/
